Abstract
In this article, Stumpff addresses policy issues regarding employee stock ownership plans and demonstrates how some claims in support of ESOPS aren’t supported by the math.
Disciplines
Law and Economics | Tax Law
Date of this Version
5-28-2018
Working Paper Citation
Stumpff Morrison, Andrew, "Perpetual Motion Machines: ESOPS Don’t Pay for Themselves" (2018). Law & Economics Working Papers. 188.
https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/188