Soft law is on the ascent in international insolvency, seeming now to occupy a preferred status over boring old conventions. An arguably constitutive aspect of soft law, which some contend provides a normative justification for international law generally, is its "dialogic" nature, by which I mean its intentional exposure to recursive norm contestation and iterative development: soft law starts a dialogue. The product of that dialogue, on a teleological view, may well be hard law. In the international insolvency realm, that pathway is through (soft) model domestic legislation that aspires toward enactment as municipal law. The happy story is that dialogue within an epistemic community can lead to salutary development. But there are also the pathologies of dialogue: discord and digression. This article discusses all three in international insolvency, with special focus on the shiniest new thing to come out of the bankruptcy technocracy: The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Recognition of Insolvency-Related Judgments. On balance, the happy story can still stand, but it needs to be candidly modified to recognize some of its warts if we are to rely upon it to guide future reform.


International Law | International Trade Law | Law and Economics | Public Law and Legal Theory

Date of this Version