Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 93 > Issue 8 (1995)
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explain why the Court's much-maligned decision in Hicks was correct, and to further argue that in the aftermath of Hicks, the McDonnell Douglas-Burdine proof structure ought to be abandoned.
Recommended Citation
Deborah C. Malamud,
The Last Minuet: Disparate Treatment After Hicks,
93
Mich. L. Rev.
2229
(1995).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol93/iss8/2
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons