Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 93 > Issue 8 (1995)
Article Title
The Last Minuet: Disparate Treatment After Hicks
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explain why the Court's much-maligned decision in Hicks was correct, and to further argue that in the aftermath of Hicks, the McDonnell Douglas-Burdine proof structure ought to be abandoned.
