Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 9 > Issue 3 (1911)
Abstract
Returning now to the general question of the master's liability for malicious acts in cases not affected by any such special considerations as those which have just been considered, it may be premised, as has been already stated, that the tendency of the modem cases is undeniably to attach less importance to the motive with which the act was done and to give more attention to the question whether or not it can be deemed to fall within the scope of the servant's employment.
Recommended Citation
Floyd R. Mechem,
Liability of Master for Wilful or Malicious Acts of Servant (II),
9
Mich. L. Rev.
181
(1911).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol9/iss3/1