Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 71 > Issue 3 (1973)
Abstract
This Note will only briefly discuss the implications of Burns for NLRB proceedings. Instead, the focus will be on the impact of Burns on actions to compel arbitration under section 301. Is the rationale of Burns inconsistent with the rule established in Wiley for section 301 actions? If it does not undermine Wiley, does Burns indicate when employers will be deemed successors in future actions under section 301 to compel arbitration? Before examining these questions, however, it is necessary to consider the decisions of Wiley and Burns.
Recommended Citation
Michigan Law Review,
Contract Rights and the Successor Employer: The Impact of Burns Security,
71
Mich. L. Rev.
571
(1973).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol71/iss3/8
Included in
Business Organizations Law Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons