Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 64 > Issue 4 (1966)
Abstract
It is currently a common if still relatively unheralded practice for a "fired" dealer to bring an antitrust action against his former manufacturer-supplier (and perhaps other dealers), alleging that his termination was the result of a boycott. Boycotts-collective efforts to obtain the exclusion of a party from a market-are illegal per se under section 1 of the Sherman Act. Thus, questions concerning the justification for the boycott or the significance of the offender's market position do not arise.
Recommended Citation
Richard M. Buxbaum,
Boycotts and Restrictive Marketing Arrangements,
64
Mich. L. Rev.
671
(1966).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol64/iss4/5
Included in
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Marketing Law Commons