Torts - Parent and Child-Doctrine of Parental Immunity

Authors

Julian J. Linde S.Ed., University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow

Abstract

Plaintiff, a minor, sustained injuries in a collision which occurred while he was riding in a car owned and driven by defendant, his father. The complaint alleged that defendant was guilty of willful and wanton misconduct, consisting of speeding on a wet road on a foggy night and of running a stop light. A motion to dismiss on the ground that the suit was contrary to public policy was sustained. On appeal, held, reversed. The doctrine of parental immunity is inapplicable to cases of willful and wanton misconduct. Nudd v Matsoukas, (III. 1956) 131 N.E. (2d) 525.

Recommended Citation

Julian J. Linde S.Ed., Torts - Parent and Child-Doctrine of Parental Immunity, 55 Mich. L. Rev. 463 (1957).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol55/iss3/14