Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 39 > Issue 4 (1941)
Abstract
Plaintiff sued upon an insurance policy, issued to her by the defendant, covering a building in which she was conducting a merchandising business. The building was owned in fee by the plaintiff's father-in-law, who had told the plaintiff that she might occupy it so long as she wished, and that he intended to deed it to her and her children. Held, plaintiff had an insurable interest in the building. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. Bolling, (Va. 1940) 10 S. E. (2d) 518.
Recommended Citation
Raymond H. Rapaport,
INSURANCE - INSURABLE INTEREST - OCCUPANT OR POSSESSOR OF REALTY,
39
Mich. L. Rev.
659
(1941).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol39/iss4/18