Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 37 > Issue 7 (1939)
Abstract
After conviction of rape allegedly committed upon defendant's thirteen year old daughter, defendant, on motion for new trial, produced an affidavit of the daughter recanting the testimony against defendant which the daughter had given at the trial. Held, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a new trial. Sutton v. State, (Ark. 1938) 122 S. W. (2d) 617.
Recommended Citation
Michigan Law Review,
CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - NEW TRIAL - MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL FOR NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE - RECANTATION BY IMPORTANT WITNESS FOR THE STATE,
37
Mich. L. Rev.
1143
(1939).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol37/iss7/20
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Evidence Commons