Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 36 > Issue 1 (1937)
Abstract
In a suit commenced by bill in aid of execution, the attorney of record of one of the defendants was allowed to testify concerning a note given to the other defendant. Held, that although this is a violation of Rule 19 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, it is not reversible error. Vozbut v. Pomputis, 277 Mich. 212, 269 N. W. 149 (1936).
Recommended Citation
Bertram H. Lebeis,
ATTORNEY AND CLIENT - CANONS OF ETHICS - ATTORNEY OF RECORD AS WITNESS FOR CLIENT,
36
Mich. L. Rev.
134
(1937).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol36/iss1/12