Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 34 > Issue 8 (1936)
Abstract
Complainants asked for a declaratory judgment that the New York Unemployment Insurance Act is unconstitutional. They contended that the law, providing for the payment of limited unemployment benefits out of a fund raised by a uniform payroll tax imposed on all employers, takes property without due process of law. Held, that the law is valid, violating neither the state nor the Federal Constitution. W. H. H. Chamberlain, Inc. v. Andrews, 271 N. Y. 1, 2 N. E. (2d) 22 (1936).
Recommended Citation
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-POLICE POWER -VALIDITY OF COMPULSORY UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT,
34
Mich. L. Rev.
1235
(1936).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol34/iss8/18
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Tax Law Commons