Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 34 > Issue 4 (1936)
Abstract
In a prosecution for larceny, held that under a Minnesota statute evidence that defendant had an irresistible impulse to steal could not establish the defense of insanity. State v. Simenson, (Minn. 1935) 262 N. W. 638.
Recommended Citation
CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE--INSANITY--IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE (KLEPTOMANIA),
34
Mich. L. Rev.
569
(1936).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol34/iss4/16