Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 34 > Issue 3 (1936)
Abstract
Defendant corporation was conducting its mining operations some distance from plaintiff's land. Plaintiff brought this action to recover for injury to his residence caused by subsidence. The judgment in the trial court represented both actual and prospective damages. On appeal it was held that plaintiff may recover only the cost of repairs. O'Donnell v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 273 Mich. 27,262 N. W. 728 (1935).
Recommended Citation
ADJOINING LANDOWNERS-INJURY FROM MINING OPERATIONS-RIGHT TO PROSPECTIVE DAMAGES,
34
Mich. L. Rev.
409
(1936).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol34/iss3/9