Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 34 > Issue 1 (1935)
Abstract
On appeal accused assigned as error the failure of the trial court to sustain his motion for a directed verdict of not guilty. The prosecutor, convinced by facts dehors the record of the innocence of the accused, confessed error. Held, confession of error does not per se justify reversal; the court must find error in the record. Parlton v. United States, (App. D. C. 1935) 75 F. (2d) 772.
Recommended Citation
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - REVERSAL ON CONFESSION OF ERROR BY PROSECUTOR,
34
Mich. L. Rev.
139
(1935).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol34/iss1/23