CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE-ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE-RULE AS TO DETERMINATION OF PRELIMINARY QUESTION OF FACT

Authors

Abstract

Following his arrest for murder, the defendant was held thirty-six hours before being arraigned for the purpose of obtaining a confession. On trial the defendant objected to introduction of the confession on the ground that it was involuntary, having been induced by wrongful detention and beating by the police. Held, failure, after due request, to instruct the jury that unnecessary delay in arraignment is prohibited by law and that such delay might be considered in determining whether or not the confession was voluntary was reversible error. People v. Alex, (N. Y. 1934) 192 N. E. 289.

Recommended Citation

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE-ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE-RULE AS TO DETERMINATION OF PRELIMINARY QUESTION OF FACT, 33 Mich. L. Rev. 441 (1935).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol33/iss3/15