Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 31 > Issue 6 (1933)
Abstract
Appellant attempted in one appeal and with a single notice of appeal to have reviewed two separate and disconnected appealable orders of the lower court made prior to final judgment, namely, an order granting a temporary injunction and an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint. Respondent moved to dismiss the appeal. Held, the appeal was duplicitous and therefore must be dismissed without leave to amend because the time for appeal was past. Grieves v. Danaher, (S. D. 1932) 243 N. W. 916.
Recommended Citation
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE -APPEAL AND ERROR-DUPLICITOUS APPEAL,
31
Mich. L. Rev.
861
(1933).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol31/iss6/23