Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 31 > Issue 5 (1933)
Abstract
The defendant, who gave the plaintiff, a real estate broker, a promissory note for services rendered pursuant to an oral contract within the statute of frauds, was held liable thereon, since he had received material pecuniary benefit under circumstances giving rise to a moral obligation to pay. Elbinger v. Capitol & Teutonia Co., (Wis. 1932) 242 N. W. 568.
Recommended Citation
CONTRACTS - STATUTE OF FRAUDS - MORAL OBLIGATION AS CONSIDERATION,
31
Mich. L. Rev.
724
(1933).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol31/iss5/14