LIMITATION OF ACTIONS AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS

Authors

Edgar H. Ailes, Member of the Detroit Bar

Abstract

All civilized States, in the interest of an efficient administration of justice, have felt compelled to fix time limits beyond which access to their courts would be denied to aggrieved parties. Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium. This was true even of Roman law in which actions were normally perpetual. Since the limitations enacted by various legislatures differ widely, and since debts are transitory, permitting suit wherever the creditor can find the debtor (at least in countries where the Common Law prevails), it is of the first practical importance that definite rules of Conflict of Laws be evolved to govern the matter.

Recommended Citation

Edgar H. Ailes, LIMITATION OF ACTIONS AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS, 31 Mich. L. Rev. 474 (1933).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol31/iss4/3