TRUSTS - COMPROMISE AGREEMENT AS MEANS OF TERMINATING TESTAMENTARY SPENDTHRIFT TRUST

Authors

Abstract

In Rose v. Southern Michigan National Bank, the Michigan Supreme Court refused to terminate a spendthrift trust composed of both real and personal property, although to end litigation upon the will all the parties in interest had signed a compromise agreement to terminate the trust according to the Michigan statute. There was no objection as to the fairness of the agreement, upon which ground the court might have refused to sanction the compromise under the statute. The decision seems to have been based upon the theory that to give effect to the compromise agreement would defeat the purpose of the testator.

Recommended Citation

TRUSTS - COMPROMISE AGREEMENT AS MEANS OF TERMINATING TESTAMENTARY SPENDTHRIFT TRUST, 31 Mich. L. Rev. 268 (1932).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol31/iss2/12