Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 31 > Issue 1 (1932)
Abstract
Plaintiff, while riding as a guest in a motorboat owned and maintained by defendant for the pleasure of his family, sustained injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the operator, defendant's son. In an action brought for damages arising out of said injuries, Felcyn v. Gamble, et al., the order sustaining demurrer interposed by defendant was affirmed, the "family automobile" doctrine being declared inapplicable.
Recommended Citation
NEGLIGENCE-"FAMILY AUTOMOBILE" DOCTRINE APPLIED TO MOTORBOAT,
31
Mich. L. Rev.
132
(1932).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol31/iss1/25
Included in
Agency Commons, Family Law Commons, Transportation Law Commons