Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 30 > Issue 6 (1932)
Abstract
The facts of this case are stated in the preceding note. The complainant sought to recover in the contempt action the profits of the infringement subsequent to the injunction decree. The circuit court of appeals refused recovery. Held, the decree of the circuit court of appeals should be reversed; profits from the sale of the infringing article are properly an element of the contempt fine. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. v. Leman (U. S. Feb. 15, 1932) Adv. Op. No. 332. (Reversing the decision in (C. C. A. 1st, 1931) 50 F.(2d) 699).
Recommended Citation
PATENTS - RECOVERY OF PROFITS IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS,
30
Mich. L. Rev.
977
(1932).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol30/iss6/27