Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 30 > Issue 6 (1932)
Abstract
The defendant, Addison, who was payee of a promissory note, indorsed it "Pay to F. Main, Wm. Addison & Son." The indorsement was directly below a printed waiver in the usual form. Apparently the only defense was failure of demand and notice. Held, the indorser must be presumed to have waived these defenses. Krenerick v. Horton, 254 Mich. 12, 235 N. W. 810 (1931).
Recommended Citation
BILLS AND NOTES-WAIVER OF DEMAND AND NOTICE IN PRINTED FORM,
30
Mich. L. Rev.
965
(1932).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol30/iss6/17