Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 29 > Issue 6 (1931)
Abstract
ln an action against an employer for personal injuries, after the plaintiff had testified as to negligence of a fellow servant, his signed statement detailing a contrary account of the injury was introduced. The trial judge charged that the statement was admissible only for the purpose of contradicting the plaintiff's testimony. Held, it was admissible as a declaration against interest with probative value, as well as to impeach the plaintiff's testimony. Pub. Utilities Corp. v. Carden (Ark. 1930) 32 S.W.(2d) 1058.
Recommended Citation
EVIDENCE-ADMISSION BY PARTY LITIGANT-SUBSTANTIVE PROOF OR IMPEACHMENT,
29
Mich. L. Rev.
787
(1931).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss6/29