Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 29 > Issue 4 (1931)
Abstract
The defendant trust company advertised that it made a specialty of drawing contracts, deeds, mortgages and wills. It also purported to specialize in the drawing of trust agreements and the management of estates. In a statutory contempt proceeding, upon proof of the performance of these functions for compensation, held the defendant was engaged in the practice of law, and guilty of contempt. In re Eastern Idaho Loan and Trust, Co. (Idaho 1930) 288 Pac. 157.
Recommended Citation
CORPORATIONS-WHAT AMOUNTS TO PRACTICE OF LAW-SOLUTION OF THE DIFFICULTY BY AGREEMENTS,
29
Mich. L. Rev.
510
(1931).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss4/19
Included in
Estates and Trusts Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal Profession Commons