Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 29 > Issue 4 (1931)
Abstract
In an action for personal injury to the plaintiff while a guest in defendant's car, the trial court instructed the jury that plaintiff must prove the elements required by the Guest Act, i.e., a heedless and reckless disregard of the rights of others, and not merely the common law requirements for negligence. The Guest Act (Pub, Acts, 1927, c. 308) was void for failure of the governor to sign in the prescribed time. Validating acts were passed after the accident in question. Held, action for personal injury was a property interest and the validating acts, operating retrospectively, impaired plaintiff's vested right. It was therefore error to "decide the action under the Guest Act. Siller v. Siller (Conn. Oct. 3, 1930) 151 Atl. 524.
Recommended Citation
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-ACTION FOR PERSONAL INJURY AS PROPERTY,
29
Mich. L. Rev.
508
(1931).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss4/16