Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 29 > Issue 2 (1930)
Abstract
See note, supra, on Chicago and N. W. Ry. v. Lindell, 281 U. S. 14, 50 Sup. Ct. 2co, 74 L. ed. (Adv, Op. 272), at page 245 of this number.
Recommended Citation
PLEADING-COUNTERCLAIM-SHIPPER'S COUNTERCLAIM IN CARRIER'S ACTION FOR FREIGHT NO VIOLATION OF INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT,
29
Mich. L. Rev.
260
(1930).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss2/29
