Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 25 > Issue 7 (1927)
Abstract
The recent and interesting Minnesota case of McGlynn v. Granstrom again raises the question of the construction of certain sections of the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Law. It is there held, that Sec. 122 of the N. I. L., requiring a "renunciation" to be in writing, does not apply to a discharge by accord and satisfaction.
Recommended Citation
BILLS AND NOTES-DISCHARGE-WHAT IS "RENUNCIATION.",
25
Mich. L. Rev.
782
(1927).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol25/iss7/6