•  
  •  
 

Authors

    Abstract

    In the recent case of Midland Nat. Bank v. Security Elevator Co. (Minn. 1924) 200 N. W. 851, the important question arises as to whether there need be a communicated acceptance of a guaranty in order to consummate a binding undertaking on the part of the guarantor. On this question there is great confusion in the authorities, both as to results and as to reasoning.

    Included in

    Contracts Commons

    Share

    COinS