Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 19 > Issue 6 (1921)
Abstract
With the death of the reason for it, every legal doctrine dies.' * * * The fact that the reason for a given rule perished long ago is no just excuse for refusing now to declare the rule itself abrogated, but rather the greater justification for so declaring; and if no, reason ever existed, that fact furnishes additional justification. The doctrine of stare decisis does not preclude a departure from precedent established by a series of decisions clearly erroneous, unless property complications have resulted and a reversal would work a greater injury and injustice than would ensue by following the rule.
Recommended Citation
H W. Humble,
Departure from Precedent,
19
Mich. L. Rev.
608
(1921).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol19/iss6/3