Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 114 > Issue 3 (2015)
Abstract
Campaign finance regulations limit speech. The laws preclude foreign nationals, including foreign corporations, from participating in U.S. politics via campaign contributions. The unusual characteristics of corporations, however, may allow foreign corporations to exploit a loophole in the regulatory regime. A foreign corporation may contribute to political campaigns by acquiring a domestic subsidiary and dominating it. This Note addresses how these unusual corporate behaviors enable foreign corporations to illegally corrupt the political process. This Note concludes that to close the loophole without violating the free speech rights of domestic subsidiaries, Congress should enact legislation which would apply corporate veil-piercing theory to the campaign finance system, reinforcing its legislation with qui tam provisions.
Recommended Citation
Ryan Rott,
Fighting Foreign-Corporate Political Access: Applying Corporate Veil-Piercing Doctrine to Domestic-Subsidiary Contributions,
114
Mich. L. Rev.
481
(2015).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol114/iss3/4
Included in
Business Organizations Law Commons, Election Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Legislation Commons