Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
1996
Abstract
People can look at non-conforming behaviour in two ways: either the person is acting immorally or the moral theory that condemns the behaviour is mistaken. To choose the former is to reflect a confidence in the existing moral theory, while choosing the latter is evidence that moral theory for that particular behaviour is wrong. This point says a lot about the link between the descriptive and evaluative enterprises of law. The development of basic moral principles, which draws from moral intuition, is a similar process when it comes to developing social practices, which in turn draw from human behaviour. Legal positivism has contributed much to clarifying the kind of social facts that characterize legal systems, specifically the kind of normative claims that legal systems typically make. Legal positivism provides much of the descriptive front. This chapter is motivated by an interest in reconciling the normative claims of law with the claims that moral philosophers believe can be justified.
Publication Information & Recommended Citation
Soper, E. Philip. "Law's Normative Claims." In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, edited by Robert P. George. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
Comments
This material was originally published in The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism edited by Robert P. George and has been reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press. For permission to reuse this material, please visit http://global.oup.com/academic/rights". Cannot be distributed inder any kind of OA license (like CC). For Journals, add to all needs permission