Document Type

Book Chapter

Publication Date

1992

Abstract

In the period covered by this supplementary article, the Supreme Court has decided a case or two a year on state regulation of commerce. Considered individually, none of the cases through mid-1989 seems destined to become a landmark in DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE doctrin. Collectively, however, the cases may indicate a decreasing emphasis on "balencing" and an increasing focus on preventing states from intentionally discriminating against out-of-state interests.

Comments

Research indicated this is an orphan work. If you are the rightsholder and want to restrict access, contact mlaw.repository@umich.edu.


Share

COinS