Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
1979
Abstract
In the essay that follows, Professor Lempert pursues the "lay versus professional" issue, once again in the jury context. He begins by setting forth a general theory of the likely contribution of each. He then applies his posited theory to two issues of current interest to the bar: jury size and the peremptory challenge. The essay originated as testimony (prepared jointly with Dr. Jay Schulman) before a Senate subcommittee considering a bill (S. 2074, 95th Congress, 1st Session) to reduce the number of peremptory challenges in civil cases from three to two and also to require all federal district courts to switch from twelve-member to six-member juries. (Now most district courts use six-member juries under local rule with the blessing of the Supreme Court.) The bill was rejected by the subcommittee, yet the issues and larger concerns persist.
Publication Information & Recommended Citation
Lempert, Richard O. "Jury Size and the Peremptory Challenge: Testimony on Jury Reform." In The Structure of Procedure, edited by Robert M. Cover and Owen M. Fiss, 349-55. Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press, 1979.
Comments
Reprinted with permission of West Academic. Originally published as Lempert, Richard O. "Jury Size and the Peremptory Challenge: Testimony on Jury Reform." In The Structure of Procedure, edited by Robert M. Cover and Owen M. Fiss, 349-55. Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press, 1979. Reprinted with the same title from Vol. 22 No. 2 Law Quadrangle Notes 8-13 (1978).