Document Type

Article

Publication Date

10-2023

Abstract

Protection of emergent works is impossible. Without an author, there is no expression of ideas which can be original, and thus no copyrightable work. Indeed, the whole system of copyright law, its conceptual building blocks of idea-expression dichotomy, originality, authorship, and the concept of a protectable work operate in the notation of human creativity. Emergent works fall outside of copyright’s positive ontology, being akin to ideas, facts, or subject-matter predicated by technical considerations, rather than authorial creativity. In other words, they do not exist as things in law and thus cannot as such be owned. Rather, like any idea, they can be transformed through creative expression of an author–– possibly becoming works, but also not being authorless or emergent anymore. This is argued as a matter of the U.S. and EU legal doctrines, the international framework, and copyright theory.

Comments

Copyright © 2023 North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology. Reproduced with permission. Originally published as Matt Blaszczyk, Impossibility of Emergent Works’ Protection in U.S. and EU Copyright Law, 25 N.C. J.L. & TECH. 1 (2023).

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology must be honored; copyright to each article is owned by its respective author(s). Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. To request permission, e-mail eic.ncjolt@gmail.com, contact the Editor-in-Chief at the below mailing address, or contact the author of the article.

Share

COinS