The Craft of Property
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2003
Abstract
Notwithstanding the modern description of property as a bundle of sticks, the forms of property still exert significant influence in legal analysis. This Article claims that both understandings of property are necessary and can indeed be incorporated into a realist approach to property. In this approach the forms of property are helpful starting points of legal analysis, for they constitute society's existing property institutions that serve as important default frameworks of interpersonal interaction. The bundle metaphor, in turn, prevents the stagnation of these institutions by allowing - indeed requiring - their normative (and properly contextual) reevaluation and possible reconfiguration.
This Article presents the realist approach to property through analysis of United States v. Craft, a 2002 Supreme Court decision involving the vulnerability of marital property to the claims of creditors of one spouse. The majority and dissent in Craft present conceptions of property as forms and property as bundles that cannot be reconciled and are fraught with difficulties. This Article develops these competing accounts and demonstrates the way in which these accounts - and the realist approach to property that connects them - can inform the analysis of marital property and, more particularly, of the rights of various types of creditors of one spouse in the marital estate. The Article concludes with an application of the realist approach to property to some difficult questions raised by the contemporary debate over the Numerus Clausus principle.
Recommended Citation
Dagan, Hanoch, "The Craft of Property" (2003). Public Law & Legal Theory Working Papers. 767.
https://repository.law.umich.edu/pub_law_archive/767