Reply to Richard A. Leo and Jon B. Gould

Authors

• Samuel R. Gross, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow
• Barbara O'Brien, Michigan State University College of Law

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2010

Abstract

In a recent article in the Ohio Journal of Criminal Law Professors Richard Leo and Jon Gould criticize some of our research on false convictions. In this brief reply we dispute some of their methodological assertions, and point out that while Leo and Gould take issue in some detail with our cautious and generally pessimistic view of research in this area, they do not actually dispute any of our empirical conclusions.

Recommended Citation

Gross, Samuel R. and O'Brien, Barbara, "Reply to Richard A. Leo and Jon B. Gould" (2010). Public Law & Legal Theory Working Papers. 637.
https://repository.law.umich.edu/pub_law_archive/637