Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR FI > Vol. 108
Article Title
Abstract
A response to David Gilo & Ehud Guttel, Negligence and Insufficient Activity: The Missing Paradigm in Torts, 108 Mich L. Rev. 277 (2009). Professors David Gilo and Ehud Guttel have written an important article on the tendency of the negligence rule to produce inefficiently low activity levels. In Negligence and Insufficient Activity: The Missing Paradigm in Torts, the authors claim insufficient activity to be the "missing paradigm" in tort theory. Although I agree with Gilo and Guttel that this missing paradigm is central to negligence doctrine, I disagree with them about how insufficient activity levels arise.
Recommended Citation
Mark Grady,
Another Theory of Insufficient Activity Levels,
108
Mich. L. Rev. First Impressions
30
(2009).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_fi/vol108/iss1/14