Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR FI > Vol. 106
Article Title
Abstract
Putting aside philosophical questions about public access to government proceedings—what we now call “transparency”—and without regard to whether televising Supreme Court arguments is a logical extension of the common law’s “absolute personal right of reasonable access to court files” as described in 1977 by the Seventh Circuit in Rush v. United States, my real concern about whether Supreme Court arguments should be televised is somewhat narcissistic. Will it make my job—as a plaintiff’s civil rights lawyer who dabbles in criminal defense and post-conviction matters and who has had five adventures as “arguing counsel” in the Supreme Court—easier? I explain below why I think the answer is a resounding “yes.”
Recommended Citation
Kenneth N. Flaxman,
Will It Make My Job Easier, or What's in it for Me?,
106
Mich. L. Rev. First Impressions
16
(2007).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_fi/vol106/iss1/27