Workmen's Compensation - Benefits - Exclusiveness of Schedule Provision

Authors

Mark Shaevsky, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow

Abstract

Plaintiff received benefits under the schedule provisions of the Michigan workmen's compensation statute for amputation of four fingers and one leg. Upon the expiration of payments the hearing officer awarded additional recovery for plaintiff's total disability resulting from the amputation. After subtracting compensation received for the specified losses, the appeal board affirmed. On appeal to the supreme court, held, affirmed by an equally divided court. The legislature intended the schedule provisions to be irreducible minimum awards, not exclusive compensation. Curtis v. Hayes Wheel Co., which construed schedule allowances as barring further recovery for total and permanent disability, is overruled. Van Dorpel v. Haven-Busch Co., 350 Mich. 135, 85 N.W. (2d) 97 (1957).

Recommended Citation

Mark Shaevsky, Workmen's Compensation - Benefits - Exclusiveness of Schedule Provision, 56 Mich. L. Rev. 827 (1958).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol56/iss5/15