EVIDENCE - CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - ADMISSIBILITY OF RECORDING MADE ON DEVICE AT RECEIVING END OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

Authors

William H. Klein, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow

Abstract

In a prosecution for conspiracy to violate the narcotic laws, defendant objected to the admission of a recorded telephone conversation between himself and an informer, taken down by the latter on a device attached to the receiver. Defendant contended that this was inadmissible under the rule of Nardone v. United States. Held, the evidence was not intercepted, therefore not within the purview of the Federal Communications Act and, consequently, admissible despite the Nardone decision. United States v. Yee Ping Jong, (D. C. Pa. 1939) 26 F. Supp. 69.

Recommended Citation

William H. Klein, EVIDENCE - CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - ADMISSIBILITY OF RECORDING MADE ON DEVICE AT RECEIVING END OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION, 38 Mich. L. Rev. 246 (1939).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol38/iss2/17