Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 33 > Issue 3 (1935)
Abstract
An infant sued by his next friend to disaffirm a contract of insurance on his own life, in which his mother and sister were named as beneficiaries, and to recover premiums paid. The insurance company claimed the right to deduct for the protection furnished insured during the continuance of the policy, but there was nothing in the record to show what this protection had cost the company. Held, the Chief Justice dissenting, the insured was entitled to recover the full amount paid. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Schiavone, (App. D. C. 1934) 71 F. (2d) 980.
Recommended Citation
DOMESTIC RELATIONS - INFANTS - RIGHT OF INSURER TO DEDUCT FOR PROTECTION FURNISHED ON INFANTS DISAFFIRMANCE OF POLICY,
33
Mich. L. Rev.
448
(1935).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol33/iss3/19
Included in
Contracts Commons, Family Law Commons, Insurance Law Commons