EVIDENCE -THE POSSIBILITY OF INCRIMINATION IN A STATE JURISDICTION DOES NOT WARRANT THE ASSERTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVILEGE IN FEDERAL PROCEEDINGS

Authors

Abstract

On indictment for the refusal to give information requested by the authorized revenue agent, the appellee interposed a special plea averring that it would compel him to become a witness against himself in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the federal Constitution which reads, "nor shall any person be compelled to be a witness against himself." Held, the danger of incrimination in a state court was not grounds for asserting the constitutional privilege. United States v. Murdock, 284 U. S. 141, 52 Sup. Ct. 63, 76 L. ed. 83 (1931).

Recommended Citation

EVIDENCE -THE POSSIBILITY OF INCRIMINATION IN A STATE JURISDICTION DOES NOT WARRANT THE ASSERTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVILEGE IN FEDERAL PROCEEDINGS, 30 Mich. L. Rev. 1116 (1932).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol30/iss7/18