Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 29 > Issue 5 (1931)
Abstract
T devised all real and personal property to wife and daughter with right to use income for life; portion remaining on their death in trust until youngest grandchild should reach 25, when any than living should receive the corpus; in default of such residue, to pass to others named. There was one grandchild living at T's death. Held, no violation of the rule against perpetuities, for grandchildren would take vested remainders. Endsley v. Hagey (Pa. 1930) 151 Atl. 799.
Recommended Citation
PERPETUITIES-PAYMENT OF CORPUS WHEN YOUNGEST GRANDCHILD REACHES 25-VESTED OR CONTINGENT,
29
Mich. L. Rev.
642
(1931).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss5/31