Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 29 > Issue 5 (1931)
Abstract
H, an Englishman, married W in England. On separation H acquired a domicil in Germany. A child was thereafter born to Y, a woman with whom H was living in Germany. H subsequently divorced W in Germany and married Y. Whether the child was legitimate determined whether H had validly exercised a power of appointment in an English settlement. Held, legitimacy is to be determined by the law of the domicil, including its rules of private international law. Germany, referring the matter to English law, found a remittance which Germany accepted and applied German municipal law. The child, by such law, is legitimate. In re Askew, [1930] 2 Ch. 259.
Recommended Citation
CONFLICT OF LAWS-RENVOI DOCTRINE,
29
Mich. L. Rev.
627
(1931).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss5/16
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Conflict of Laws Commons, Family Law Commons, International Law Commons