INJUNCTION-AGAINST TORT-BALANCE OF CONVENIENCE

Authors

Abstract

The defendant railroad company held a lease for a right of way to and from the complainant's flour mill. In violation of their lease, and over the protest of the plaintiff, a side track was run from the branch track of the complainant to the track of the Litchfield Dairy Association and later extended to the plant of the defendant association, a competitor of the complainant. Held, the complainant was entitled to a decree restraining the defendants from moving cars for the defendant association over the complainant's side track. Affirmed. Stock and Sons v. Litchfield Coop. Shipper's Ass'n. et al. (Mich. 1930) 232 N.W. 395.

Recommended Citation

INJUNCTION-AGAINST TORT-BALANCE OF CONVENIENCE, 29 Mich. L. Rev. 516 (1931).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss4/25