Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 29 > Issue 3 (1931)
Abstract
Both parties to this ejectment suit relied for title on testatrix's will. By one clause, in general words it gave away all of her property real and personal; by a subsequent clause, all the estate unused or not required for the support of the first taker was given over. Held, that the first taker got only a life estate with power to consume, for the intent of testator is predominant over a statute creating a fee from a general gift. Chesnut v. Chesnut (Pa. 1930) 151 Atl. 339.
Recommended Citation
WILLS-DEVISE-WHEN CUT DOWN BY LATER CLAUSE,
29
Mich. L. Rev.
392
(1931).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss3/40