Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 29 > Issue 3 (1931)
Abstract
The defendant was convicted under a state prohibition statute. The information was filed on June 7, 1929, and no further proceedings were taken against him for more than sixty days thereafter. The defendant moved to dismiss the suit on the ground that he had not had a speedy trial. No jury was on duty during the months of July, August, and the early part of September. Held, that the constitutional guaranty of a speedy trial was not infringed by such delay. State v. Vukich (Wash. 1930) 290 Pac. 992.
Recommended Citation
CRIMES-SPEEDY TRIAL-JUSTIFICATION FOR DELAY,
29
Mich. L. Rev.
373
(1931).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss3/20