Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 29 > Issue 2 (1930)
Abstract
In a criminal case, the defendant requested an instruction defining the term "reasonable doubt." The court refused the request and the defendant excepted. Held, the instruction should have been given. State v. Vukich (Wash. 1930) 290 Pac. 992.
Recommended Citation
CRIMES-REASONABLE DOUBT-NECESSITY OF DEFINING-DEFINITION,
29
Mich. L. Rev.
252
(1930).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss2/20