Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 26 > Issue 4 (1928)
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-METHODS OF TESTING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF RATE STATUS INVOLVING HEAVY PENALTIES
Abstract
Where a state statute prescribes maximum intrastate railroad rates and also attaches heavy penalties for violations of the statute by a railroad or its agents, and where a railroad thinks the rates are confiscatory and hence unconstitutional, it is faced with an apparent dilemma. Must it either submit to the supposed confiscatory rates or else run the chance of incurring heavy penalties in case the statute is held constitutional? Or, is there another alternative-a painless way of testing the validity of the rates?
Recommended Citation
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-METHODS OF TESTING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF RATE STATUS INVOLVING HEAVY PENALTIES,
26
Mich. L. Rev.
415
(1928).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol26/iss4/6
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Legal Remedies Commons, Litigation Commons